Tuesday, 3 November 2026LatestVideosAboutContact
Latest
Foreign divorce decree on irretrievable breakdown not valid in India: SCIndie games are missing launch dates because Steam is backed upGoogle’s Gemini-powered Home Speaker is already on sale for 20 percent offNo more Messi as Argentina announces squad for November friendliesRobinson wins England cricketer of the year awardMaaya Rajeshwaran scores big upset, Vaishnavi Adkar earns maiden tour winShooting | Disappointing day for shooters at Worlds with one final and no Olympic quotaMaaya Rajeshwaran, Vaishnavi Adkar notch maiden Tour-level wins at Chennai OpenWatch: Prema Rawat smashes fastest fifty in women’s T20sMedical costs in India projected to rise 10.1pc in 2027: AonWest Ham sacks Nuno Espirito Santo, Scott Parker emerges as favourite to replace him'Double mutualist' birds are key to mistletoe reproduction
NationalUpdated 1 hr ago

Telangana HC allows farmer to challenge quarrying permissions in Ranga Reddy

Image: Telangana Today

Hyderabad: Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy and Justice Gadi Praveen Kumar of the Telangana High Court on Tuesday granted liberty to a petitioner to approach the appropriate appellate authority challenging the consent orders issued by the Telangana State Pollution Control Board in connection with quarrying, stone crushing and blasting activities at Akuthotapally Village in Amangal Mandal of Ranga Reddy district.

The Division Bench was hearing a petition filed by farmer Anji Reddy, alleging that the authorities had failed to effectively regulate quarrying, stone crushing and blasting activities being undertaken in Survey Nos. 302 and 304 of Akuthotapally Village. Counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that permissions had been granted without a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact and without considering the cumulative impact of other mining operations in the surrounding areas.

During the hearing, the Government counsel submitted that no quarrying or related activities had commenced at the site. Taking note of the submission, the Division Bench clarified that the petitioner was at liberty to challenge the consent orders issued by the Pollution Control Board before the appropriate appellate authority. The Bench further observed that if the activities were commenced contrary to the submission made before the Court, the petitioner would be at liberty to directly initiate contempt proceedings. Recording the above submissions and granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate legal remedy, the Court disposed of the proceedings.

This content is published by Telangana Today and has not been created or edited by Hello Headlines. View original

More in National

See all