Tuesday, 27 October 2026LatestVideosAboutContact
Latest
Jeevan Reddy urges Congress to resume Kannepalli pumpingPaper industry seeks PM’s intervention as coal costs surge 50% in two monthsHPS students attend Round Square International Conference in Australia5 developmental imperatives, including increasing credit intensity, would underpin India’s journey towards Viksit Bharat: Shaktikanta DasJERA signs pact with AM Green for long-term supply of green ammoniaMahindra Lifespace adds 10.5-acre land in Bengaluru for housing project worth ₹1,250 crNZ vs IND 2026: Umpires lose count of balls amid Abhishek Sharma's carnage in 3rd T20IMaruti Q2FY27 results: Net profit declines 26.36% to ₹2,466.1 croreWabtec bags $94 million order for Vande Bharat sleeper trainsYuvraj Singh pokes fun at mentee Abhishek Sharma for failing to break his T20I record during Wellington centuryElection Commission Tightens Posting Rules Ahead Of Assembly Polls In 5 StatesRupee closes marginally up 3 paise at 95.12 against US dollar amid elevated crude oil prices
NationalUpdated 1 hr ago

SC notice on pleas challenging law mandating Vande Mataram

Image: The Siasat Daily

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday, October 27, agreed to examine fresh petitions challenging the law mandating the singing of all six stanzas of Vande Mataram.

A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notice to the Centre and others on pleas filed by Bhimrao Duryodhan Borkar and former IAS officer Balakrishnan Sathyabhama Mavoji.

The top court tagged the petitions with similar pleas and posted the matter for hearing on November 30.

Borkar has argued in his plea that the orders of the Ministry of Home Affairs dated January 28 and July 9, 2026, illegally replace the 79-year-old practice of singing a standalone, non-theistic two-stanza poem with the full version containing “explicit anti-Muslim invective”.

“Under the guise of providing directions on the playing and singing of an ‘official version’… the impugned orders repealed the existing National Song… and imposed a new National Song which is the six-stanza civil war song of Anandamath with its unconstitutional idolatrous and Islamophobic content,” the plea submitted.

Mavoji contended that installing the six-stanza version as the national anthem is an attempt to convert India into a divine sectarian theistic state.

A “conscientious objector” should not be punished for refusing to sing Vande Mataram, the top court had told the Centre on September 22 while asking it to keep in mind a 1986 judgment protecting children who said no to singing the national anthem on grounds of conscience.

The bench was at that time hearing a petition by Carnatic vocalist T M Krishna challenging the law mandating singing of all six stanzas of Vande Mataram, arguing that the last four verses violate the secular character of the nation.

Seeking the Centre’s response on the plea, the bench had said it would expect the principle laid down by the apex court’s 1986 judgment in Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of Kerala to govern the amended law.

In that case, the court protected schoolchildren who respectfully declined to sing the national anthem on grounds of conscience.

Get the latest updates in Hyderabad City News, Technology, Entertainment, Sports, Politics and Top Stories on WhatsApp & Telegram by subscribing to our channels. You can also download our app for Android and iOS.

This content is published by The Siasat Daily and has not been created or edited by Hello Headlines. View original

More in National

See all