Thursday, 5 November 2026LatestVideosAboutContact
Latest
Heavy traffic expected around Bhagyalaxmi Temple for DiwaliHyderabad police arrest six, hunt for two suspects in murder caseVirat Kohli's Three Highest Scores in T20I CricketNASA announces experimental X-70 Fractal aircraft: A 'new beginning for aeronautics'India's tour of Bangladesh could be back on the cards, January window being exploredDubai: Indian expat’s 4-year wait ends with Rs 64 cr Big Ticket winKarnataka releases ₹17.43 crore in first tranche of drought relief; ₹5,000 aid per eligible Yadgir farmerHyderabad researchers identify two rare gene variants linked to heart diseaseHyderabadi author Ravi Kaza brings 150 years of Test cricket to the pageLove chicken biryani, Tangdi Kebab? Gear up to pay more as prices set to rise in TelanganaBRS announces Chalo Kokapet protest, demands withdrawal of GO 14 on BC Atma Gourava BhavansEmami weighs more acquisitions as digital-first brands zoom
NationalUpdated 1 hr ago

Sharjeel Imam moves Supreme Court, says no witness examined yet

Image: The Siasat Daily

New Delhi: Activist Sharjeel Imam has moved the Supreme Court against a Delhi High Court order refusing him bail in an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) case, claiming that no witness has been examined yet.

In his plea before the top court, Imam argued that he should be granted bail as the prosecution has failed to examine witnesses and the one-year embargo imposed by the top court is about to expire.

The petition said the chargesheet was filed on September 25, 2020, in which 18 accused face trial and the prosecution has cited more than 900 witnesses, including 47 protected witnesses.

Imam submitted that despite spending six years and nine months as an undertrial, the prosecution has failed to examine even a single witness.

Delhi HC rejects bail plea in Sept

The Delhi High Court on September 30 refused to grant bail to activists Umar Khalid and Imam in a case under UAPA on the “larger conspiracy” behind the February 2020 northeast Delhi riots.

Asserting that it is bound by “judicial discipline”, the high court said it could not modify the Supreme Court’s January 5 order asking the two accused to seek bail either on completion of protected witnesses’ examination or expiry of one year, whichever is earlier.

Trial court rejected bail plea in July

Khalid and Imam challenged the trial court’s July 4 decision rejecting their bail pleas for the third time since their arrest.

The trial court had rejected the bail applications, saying it had “no option but to follow” the Supreme Court’s January 5 order and, therefore, could neither entertain the plea nor grant any relief.

The high court had noted that while denying bail to the two accused in January, the top court had said their roles were distinct from the other co-accused, and they were the “ideological drivers” of the alleged conspiracy.

Booked under UAPA, accused of being ‘masterminds’

Khalid and Imam have been booked under UAPA on allegations of being among the masterminds of the February 2020 riots that left 53 people dead and more than 700 injured.

The violence erupted during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019, and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).

Activist Khalid Saifi and former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain, among others, were also booked for their alleged involvement in the larger conspiracy case, being investigated by Delhi Police’s Special Cell.

Imam was arrested in the case on August 25, 2020, while Khalid was arrested on September 13, 2020.

On September 2, 2025, a high court division bench denied bail to Khalid and Imam.

Supreme Court’s Jan 5 ruling

On January 5, the Supreme Court upheld the verdict but granted relief to co-accused Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa Ur Rehman, Mohammad Saleem Khan and Shadab Ahmad.

A bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria had then observed that there was a prima facie case against Khalid and Imam under the UAPA.

Khalid and Imam, who have been incarcerated since 2020, can file fresh bail applications after examination of protected witnesses or after one year from today, the SC had said, as it rejected their contention of delay in trial.

On May 22, the top court granted six-month interim bail to co-accused Abdul Khalid Saifi and Tasleem Ahmad, referring the issue of prolonged incarceration of undertrials under UAPA due to stringent prerequisites for bail to a larger bench.

Get the latest updates in Hyderabad City News, Technology, Entertainment, Sports, Politics and Top Stories on WhatsApp & Telegram by subscribing to our channels. You can also download our app for Android and iOS.

This content is published by The Siasat Daily and has not been created or edited by Hello Headlines. View original

More in National

See all