Tuesday, 27 October 2026LatestVideosAboutContact
Latest
India braces for Cyclone Arnab with evacuationsFormer Tamil Nadu Minister Anbil Mahesh Arrested In Rs 100 Crore Private Schools ScamJayesh Ranjan’s VRS plans spark debate over administrationGasping for air: Borneo residents struggle as island burnsIndian sports wrap, October 27: Injured para-cyclist Arshad Shaikh undergoes surgeryRage over E20 fuel was 'paid campaign': Nitin GadkariTTD lodges police complaint over reels filmed in front of Srivari TemplePM Modi, Liechtenstein's Prince Alois hold talks to boost tiesShaan Surprises Fans With Michael Jackson Tribute In Dubai, Recreates ‘Billie Jean’ Moonwalk: WATCHStudy finds plant-based meat offers more absorbable protein than chickenBihar Board 2027: Class 10, 12 Registration Deadline Nears, Apply By October 31Most watched Pakistani drama right now in 2026, beats Tere Bin
NationalUpdated 1 hr ago

Supreme Court Defers Hearing On Pleas Challenging CEC Gyanesh Kumar, SIR

Image: ABP Live

The Supreme Court on Tuesday deferred the hearing of petitions challenging Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and decisions taken by the Election Commission of India (ECI) during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The court granted petitioners 10 days to respond to the poll body's affidavit, with the next hearing likely to take place on November 17.

During the proceedings, senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for the petitioners, sought 10 days to file a response to the ECI's affidavit. The court also asked the Election Commission to file its replies to the other petitions in the matter.

Plea Raises Form 6 Tampering Allegation

During the hearing, senior advocate Dr Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for Trinamool Congress MP Dola Sen, raised concerns over alleged tampering with online Form 6, which is used to apply for inclusion of names in electoral rolls.

Guruswamy submitted that the issue concerned the Election Commission's functioning, including the alleged alteration of online Form 6 and a press note issued by the poll body. She argued that the press note claimed the Supreme Court bench had authorised such alterations.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant responded that the court would examine the matter. According to LiveLaw's report, the Chief Justice also said that the court was issuing notice.

Guruswamy further argued that the Election Commission was seeking to justify the alleged alterations to the form.

Appearing for the ECI, senior advocate Maninder Singh opposed the contention, arguing that the issue was being raised with a different motive and should not be permitted.

Next Hearing Likely On November 17

The Supreme Court granted the main petitioner in the CEC-SIR case, Rakesh Kumar Singh, 10 days to file a response to the Election Commission's affidavit. The poll body was also directed to submit its replies to the remaining petitions.

The matter is likely to be taken up again on November 17.

This content is published by ABP Live - India and has not been created or edited by Hello Headlines. View original

More in National

See all