Tuesday, 27 October 2026LatestVideosAboutContact
Latest
Mirchowk Inspector, Home Guard caught for taking Rs 3L bribeSaranu Nishant takes five wickets as Hyderabad bowl out Uttar Pradesh for 168Telangana declares 365 mandals drought-affected for Vanakalam 2026Ocean warming and herbivorous fish grazing drive kelp forest collapse along Japan's Izu PeninsulaVisionQuest is what happens when AI really goes rogueAsian Champions Trophy Hockey: India thrash Bangladesh 13-0Toronto Raptors: Kawhi Leonard to miss at least a week with swelling in left kneeApple launches MacBook Pro and iMac with M6 chip, updates Creator StudioTelangana declares 365 mandals drought-hit, initiates relief‘Needle, Not Scissors’: Neetu Kapoor Once Revealed What Kind Of Daughter-In-Law She Wanted For Ranbir KapoorTelangana HC warns Chief Secretary over delay in DSC-2002 appointmentsMetal-free magnetic sensor can be safely implanted for wireless monitoring

EC Pulls the Chain on Anti-CEC Campaign? Unanimity Claim Changes the S.I.R Battle | THE HARD FACTS

The Election Commission of India has launched a detailed legal defence against allegations of unilateral decision-making, filing a joint counter-affidavit before the Supreme Court asserting that all three Special Intensive Revision (SIR) orders were approved unanimously by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The affidavit also rejects allegations that the statutory Form 6 used for voter enrolment was amended.